The existence of such a fiction, moreover, tells against another tempting account of the distinctive moral wrong of battery, on which the wrong consists in deliberately harming or offending (or deliberately touching in a foreseeably harmful or conventionally offensive way) another person.190 Suppose that the defendant is a hit man seeking to murder A with a sniper rifle. A is in his line of sight, but then B, whom the defendant has no desire to kill, moves in front of A. As the defendant knows, therefore, if he pulls the trigger of his rifle, the bullet will unavoidably kill B on its path to killing A. When he pulls the trigger and kills both A and B, the defendant seriously wrongs both of them. And it does not seem that the defendant’s wrong to A is significantly graver than, or in some important respect morally distinct from, his wrong to B: These victims are more or less equally mistreated. Certainly these culpable and wrongful injurings do not seem morally distinct in any way that bears upon the defendant’s remedial moral liabilities: The defendant is liable to B’s estate no less than A’s estate, and it would not be morally permissible or proper for the defendant, if rendered insolvent, to give any significant priority to satisfying one liability over the other.
| Let of name * expr * expr (* let x = e1 in e2 *)
，这一点在whatsapp中也有详细论述
Лига чемпионов|1/8 финала. 1-й матч
15+ Premium newsletters from leading experts
What AIO Actually Means and Why It Matters