During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
copaceticthoughts
The deliberately provocative national advertising campaign calls for all social media to be banned for children under the age of 16. The images on billboards and social media make a number of stark statements related to health.，推荐阅读一键获取谷歌浏览器下载获取更多信息
view = result.value; // Must reassign
，详情可参考搜狗输入法2026
Последние новости。关于这个话题，服务器推荐提供了深入分析
第二十七条 在法律、行政法规规定的国家考试中，有下列行为之一，扰乱考试秩序的，处违法所得一倍以上五倍以下罚款，没有违法所得或者违法所得不足一千元的，处一千元以上三千元以下罚款；情节较重的，处五日以上十五日以下拘留：